Tag Archives: michael watt

The 39 Steps – a new Teatro classic!

Priya Narine as Annabella Schmidt and Geoffrey Simon Brown as Richard Hannay, in The 39 Steps.

Photo Marc Chalifoux, costumes Brian Bast, set Chantel Fortin, lighting Rory Turner

The first play in the new Teatro Live! season, Farren Timoteo’s first as artistic director, is the hilarious, fast-moving, and farfetched The 39 Steps.

The 39 Steps was first a 1915 adventure novel / melodramatic thriller by John Buchan, who later served as the 15th Governor-General of Canada. I read the novel as a teenager, along with Buchan’s other works Greenmantle and Prester John, because my father had kept his childhood copies. It was adapted into a spy-thriller movie by Alfred Hitchcock in 1935, and had a few later film adaptations as well. In 2005, Patrick Barlow wrote this stage-play based on the earlier versions, but dialing everything up to the point of parody for 21st-century audiences.

The curtains open on emo-self-absorbed Richard Hannay, slouching in an armchair in his half-unpacked London flat, explaining that all his friends have moved away or died and he is bored. In this production Hannay is played by Geoffrey Simon Brown, who brings an amusing mix of bravado and bewilderment to the role.

Fortunately for the audience, his state of ennui doesn’t last long! A trip to the (vaudeville) theatre brings him an encounter with a mysterious woman (Priya Narine), who demands sanctuary in his apartment but ends up being murdered after entrusting him with vague secrets and missions.

Many many minor characters in the story of Hannay’s flight across England and Scotland are portrayed by two ensemble members (billed as Clown 1 and Clown 2), Michael Watt and Katie Yoner. Watt and Yoner are both noted physical-comedy performers in their own work as well as BFA-educated actors, and they were perfect for these roles, in which the quick-changes are acknowledged and sometimes flawed. Edmonton audiences rarely applaud transitions, but there was one shift that had Yoner’s character grabbing the four chairs and a table that had been representing a vehicle, and striking all of them in one trip, ending with crashing and banging in the wings.

Michael Watt, Katie Yoner, and Geoffrey Simon Brown in The 39 Steps. Lighting Rory Turner, Costumes, Brian Bast, Set Chantel Fortin. Photos Marc Chalifoux Photography.

Narine also portrays some other characters encountered by Hannay – an indignant rail passenger who reports him to the police, a lonely young Scottish crofter – sending up various tropes of women in early-20th-century thrillers.

I recalled a previous production of 39 Steps that I saw in the intimate space of Walterdale Theatre in 2022, where I kept swivelling my head back and forth to follow the fast-paced action of a train across the Forth Rail Bridge, a manhunt by air, a flight across misty sheep-pasture, and a final showdown back in a London theatre. I wondered how Timoteo’s direction in the larger traditional proscenium-stage auditorium would evoke the urgency and immersive nature of the script. And I was pleasantly surprised! Some of the action had me gasping and laughing because even with my vague memories of the story I hadn’t predicted what was going to happen next and how.

Design choices for this production all supported the action which was central to the play. Many set pieces (Chantel Fortin) were used in different creative ways. Lighting (Rory Turner), fog, sound, and Brian Bast’s costuming added atmosphere and affirmed the familiar tropes.

I found some of the dialogue hard to hear or understand, particularly when they were speaking quickly in unfamiliar accents over background sounds of trains or gunshots. But it wasn’t hard to follow. The plot was both farfetched and satisfying, and it was a great night out.

The 39 Steps is playing at the Varscona Theatre until November 30th, with tickets available here and at the door.

Next on my theatregoing calendar are two shows next weekend:

Guys and Dolls, the Loesser/Swerling/Burrows 1950 musical, a Foote in the Door production at La Cité Francophone / Théâtre Servus Credit Union, running Nov 21-Nov 30. Tickets here!

PepperMUNT, the bi-munt-ly late cabaret, will be on Saturday November 22nd, this time in the Old Strathcona Farmers’ Market. Tickets here!

Bea, by Mick Gordon

Kristen Unruh, in Shadow Theatre’s Bea. Photo Marc Chalifoux. Costume Design Deanna Finnman, Set Design Ximena Pinilla. Lighting Design Whittyn Jason.

Publicity for the Shadow Theatre show Bea had enough warnings that I knew it would be about a young person who wants to die with dignity or on her own terms. That topic’s not for everyone, so I was glad to know that much. Bea was written by Northern Irish playwright Mick Gordon, in 2010. This production was directed by Amanda Goldberg, a recent Artistic Director Fellowship holder at Shadow Theatre.

I was intrigued to see recent BFA grads Michael Watt and Kristen Unruh on a professional stage, along with Kate Newby (she played Dorothy Parker in Fresh Hell at Shadow a couple of years ago).

The other thing I knew about the production beforehand was that the set was partially crowdsourced. I saw an appeal from set designer Ximena Pinilla for old costume jewellery, so I dropped off a bag of shiny things. The focus of the set was a bed. On one side were the trappings of medical care, with one of those wheeled over-bed tables that I’ve seen in hospitals and nursing homes. On the other side of the bed were a young woman’s personal belongings and a rack of fabulous outfits. And above — suspended above and behind the bed were big grid displays of earrings. Like a Claire’s to excess.

Kristen Unruh’s character Bea enters, dancing, singing, sprawling on the floor to read a magazine. She might be sixteen, or a decade older, but she’s clearly lively and joyful and this is her space. Then a young man in rumpled shirt and too-short tie enters nervously, holding a satchel and his CV. Ray (Michael Watt) is her new personal care assistant – or he’s interviewing for the job, it’s not quite clear. And as the other character enters, Bea gradually melts onto the bed. She’s still animated, mouthy, full of poetry and wordplay, sitting cross-legged on her bed and enjoying putting the awkward young man on the spot. They connect. And in this first meeting, she asks him to take dictation, as she speaks a letter to her mother, saying that she wishes to die and wants her mother to help her.

Bea’s mother Catherine (Kate Newby) then arrives to give Ray a sterner scrutiny and tell him the rules of employment – from “No prurience” (which he admits he needs to look up later) and “Kindness” to “No secrets” – awkward because he is already carrying one secret, the dictated letter. As Catherine, a lawyer in severe black suit, grills Ray, I become aware that Bea has collapsed immobile onto her stack of pillows. Is this how her body really is, in the time of the play? We see this contrast playing out over and over throughout the narrative – Bea dancing and active alone and sometimes with Ray, but also needing to be fed and bathed, speaking with difficulty, twitching in pain.

I found the character Bea likeable and funny and frank. I revised my age-estimate upwards when she tells an uncomfortable Ray that she hasn’t had sex for nine years and misses it. Ray is clearly on her side. He jumps into her stories and daydreams, reluctantly revealing bits of his own context.

One of the most enjoyable bits of the play, for me, is the part where Ray brings in a script for A Streetcar Named Desire, introduces the classic, and reads it / acts it out with Bea. Both Unruh and Watt are up to the physical, emotional, and vocal challenges of these roles, and I look forward to seeing each of them again.

Every time Ray is taking frivolous liberties, though, Catherine walks in and is horrified. The audience gets to expect this. It’s still funny in a rule-of-three way, but maybe it’s not all needed. I do love Kate Newby’s still body language and flat affect with horror underneath.

In a few Catherine-Bea scenes, we learn that the two of them have been on their own for several years. They love and respect each other – and Catherine does still see Bea as the playful clever girl of the solo scenes and memories, not just the patient.

So the stakes are very high, when Catherine learns of Bea’s “demand”. And in fact even higher, because they live in a place and time without MAiD (medical assistance in dying), where assisted suicide would be prosecuted as murder. So in one shocking change-of-mood scene without Bea present, Ray explains to Catherine how it should be done, if/when she chooses. Details about how to ensure that a first attempt is successful, but also details about how to present it afterwards to the police and legal authorities. Blunt, explicit, disturbing. How does young Ray know all of this and speak with authority? I can make up a backstory but it’s not in the text.

The actors were great, but the script left me with some questions. I wondered if it would have been stronger if shorter, or if the repeating cycle of visits from Ray, revelations and intimacies, judgement by Catherine, re-connection between Catherine and Bea … was all necessary to make us care about Bea and her people and to see the necessity and the anguish of her death. The illness is not named, and that was probably a better choice than giving us a specific diagnosis that we might know about. We learn that she won’t get better, but it wasn’t clear to me whether she was getting worse and whether it would eventually kill her. There were a few Canadian references sprinkled in – the story about Ray’s friend trying to hold up a CIBC and accidentally going to Kentucky Fried Chicken was not the only one, there was a reference that made me think Toronto – but there was other wording that felt natively British (Ray’s friend in that story having a nickname like Bazza or Jazzer, for example) so that distracted me.

I have not been intimately involved with a MAiD or assisted suicide situation myself, although pre-MAID I have helped to make a decision to remove life support. The practical awfulness of implementing Bea’s request, as shown on stage, definitely confirmed my belief that there are some situations in which offering MAiD would be more humane. But, as the director’s program note quotes disability dramaturg Miranda Allen, “When MAiD is available and supports for living are not, MAiD becomes problematic.” That’s not relevant to the characters on stage – for them, assisted suicide is illegal, and it seems that Catherine is financially able to support Bea in comfort and employ Ray as caregiver. But it’s an important thought for any audience member who might go away smugly distancing ourselves from the dilemma of the play. Death and life are even more messy and complicated, in real life and real death.

Bea is playing at the Varscona Theatre on 83 Avenue until February 9th. Lots to think about, and more fun than I expected. Tickets available here.

Magic, survival, and hidden patterns – a Fringe weekend

The last four shows I saw in Fringe 2024 included two shows with stage magic and two shows with young women prepping for endtimes or disasters. But four very different experiences!

El Diablo of the Cards was a solo sleight-of-hand performance by Ewerton Martins of Brazil, in red nose. He greets guests in line outside Gateway Theatre, then seats some people on the stage of the intimate black box and goes back outside to announce more arrivals as “next victims!” and keeps promising that the show will start in five minutes. Eventually he taps one of the audience members to give him an introduction, and the one who did it in the Saturday show did a great job. His patter is amusing and he gets help from several audience members without making fun of them. And his tricks are astonishing and delightful.

kicked in the end: a magic show was a solo performance by actor/magician/academic/author Shawn DeSouza-Coelho, in the Kick Point OSPAC space. This charismatic performer also engaged with audience members before the official show start, and then reminded us that as per the show title, before the end of show, there would be some kind of kicking of someone. While we were puzzling over that one, he gave us a long riddle of descriptive poetic phrases that didn’t fit together at all, and then gave us one word that made them all make sense. He engaged audience assistants to conduct various magic tricks. I wasn’t sure what to attribute to physics, what to attribute to impressive “reading” of participants, and what was actually sleight of hand. In between, he told stories from his life which would have made an interesting show even without the magic and interaction. Later it became clear that just as the apparently-unconnected lines of the riddle made sense once the keyword was revealed, the anecdotes also had a common thread in racist microaggression. The structure of the show, particularly the ending that subverted my expectations of what a performer “owes” the audience, had me feeling as if I discovered my own problematic beliefs rather than having someone else call me out, which was much more effective. (Emo Majok’s gentle poking fun felt similar). I don’t know whether the performer teaches undergraduates, but I hope for the sake of York students that he does. Shawn DeSouza-Coelho is also the author of the fascinating biography of Stratford stage manager Nora Polley, Whenever You’re Ready, which I recommend.

Let’s Not Turn on Each Other features creative partners and recent BFA grads Jacquelin Walters and Michael Watt, who have been making performances together at Nextfest, at U of A New Works, and elsewhere. This one, billed as a play with original folksongs, was performed at Spotlight Cabaret, but is going to be held over at the Westbury Theatre next Friday and Saturday. (Note – you might remember that in past years, holdover performances cost more than tickets to regular Fringe shows. This year they’re a flat $20 – the same as the maximum price during the festival.)

Anyway, it’s weird, and playful, and engaging. The two performers, wearing plain modest dresses and blonde milkmaid braids under kerchiefs, are members of a guild, assigned to guard an outpost until they get a signal from their leader. It’s not clear if this is a religion or a doomsday-prep group or what, but they both seem completely devoted to their required daily schedule and the instructions they get from cassette tapes. They sing and play instruments, they make an expedition around the audience space which culminates in some participation from Spotlight serving staff, and eventually they make some discoveries that upset their belief system. See the holdover — and watch for these two in future. I understand that Michael Watt will be playing the eponymous Shrek in an upcoming Nuova Vocal Arts production.

W.R.O.L. (Without Rule of Law) has a more realistic setting and tone, but again it seems to be about a group of young-teen girls who have deviated from standard Girl Guides curriculum to teach themselves survivalist prepping. The script is by Michaela Jeffery – previous works of hers I’d seen in Edmonton were Sundogs (Fringe 2014) and The Listening Room (Cardiac Theatre, 2018). Emily Marisabel directed W.R.O.L. Set designer Amanda Bertrand and prop designer Kevin Cambridge have constructed an impressively detailed space for the group to explore, especially given the 15-minute limitations on setup and strike for each show. Performers Robyn Clark, Baran Demir, Astrid Deibert, Emily Thorne, and Jordan Empson bring five different characters to life, each with their own needs and motivations for becoming competent and independent. At first, the group’s concerns about solving mysteries and defying school restrictions seem immature or foolish, but by the end it seemed to me that they had credible good reasons to mistrust their authority figures, reasons that many contemporary young people might share.